Advocate responds to SD high court overturning adult-use cannabis

Advocate responds to SD high court overturning adult-use cannabis

South Dakota’s highest court sided with the state’s governor today in declaring an amendment legalizing cannabis invalid. Amendment A, which passed with 54% support, would have legalized cannabis for anyone over 21.

Voters approved both medical and adult-use cannabis laws by ballot initiative last November. While the medical program went unchallenged, Governor Kristi Noem’s administration went to court to block Amendment A, the adult-use cannabis initiative. The state’s supreme court sided with Noem this afternoon.

Matthew Schweich, campaign director for South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws, issued the following statement in response.

“We believe that this ruling from the South Dakota Supreme Court is extremely flawed. The court has rejected common sense and instead used a far-fetched legal theory to overturn a law passed by over 225,000 South Dakota voters based on no logical or evidentiary support. The ruling states that Amendment A comprised three subjects — recreational marijuana, medical marijuana, and hemp legalization — and that South Dakotans could not tell what they were voting on when voting for Amendment A.

It’s a legal stretch and one that relies on the disrespectful assumption that South Dakota voters were intellectually incapable of understanding the initiative.

Furthermore, this reasoning is wrong for a number of reasons:

  1. As the dissent points out, there was no evidence of voter confusion. It’s unacceptable that the court would violate the ballot initiative process based on no actual evidence.
  2. It is clear voters understood that Amendment A was not solely a medical marijuana initiative given that only 54% of voters approved Amendment A while 70% of voters approved Measure 26 (an initiated measure that only addressed medical marijuana). If voters believed Amendment A was a medical marijuana-only initiative, there would not have been a 16-point gap in the election results.
  3. The assertion that South Dakota voters believed Amendment A was solely a hemp legalization initiative defies logic and reality. Furthermore, South Dakota had already enacted hemp legalization by the time voters approved Amendment A.
  4. Medical marijuana and hemp were mentioned in just three sentences in Amendment A. The rest of the initiative addressed recreational marijuana. Furthermore, it’s worth noting that recreational marijuana, medical marijuana, and hemp are all versions of the same plant: cannabis.

The fact that the South Dakota Supreme Court took nearly seven months to issue a ruling on an election-related lawsuit is extremely problematic. This indefensible delay undermined the public’s faith in South Dakota’s elections, its system of government, and its judiciary. The court owes the people of South Dakota an explanation.

Finally, this ruling relied on Gov. Noem’s role in directing Colonel Miller to commence the litigation. The evidence for this is a mysteriously-timed executive order issued on January 8, 2021, nearly two months after the lawsuit was filed in court. The executive order directly contradicted a statement from Noem spokesperson Ian Fury, who said on November 23, 2020 that, “Gov. Noem did not ask Col. Miller or Sheriff Thom to bring the lawsuit.” This inconsistency has never been explained. Governor Noem owes the public an explanation. We should know whether the executive order issued in January was truthful.

We are as energized as ever to continue our work. We will not stop until cannabis is legalized in South Dakota.”

South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws (SDBML) is a registered South Dakota statewide ballot question committee working to establish better marijuana laws for the people of South Dakota. SDBML led the campaign that passed Amendment A and Measure 26 in 2020, played a central role in the grassroots campaign to defend Measure 26 during the legislative session earlier this year, and provided fundraising and communications support to the Amendment A legal defense campaign.

  • Advocate responds to SD high court overturning adult-use cannabis
    South Dakota’s highest court sided with the state’s governor today in declaring an amendment legalizing cannabis invalid. Amendment A, which passed with 54% support, would have legalized cannabis for anyone over 21.
  • Organizer says next steps on Ohio adult-use cannabis by month’s end
    Ohio attorney Thomas Haren, a representative of the “Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol,” said he expects that enough signatures will be gathered to move a proposal forward that would allow for adult use, sale, and possession of marijuana in Ohio.
  • Montana regulators will reverse proposed CBD, dispensary worker rules
    The Montana Department of Revenue told lawmakers this week that it will strike a pair of proposed rules implementing the state’s fledgling recreational marijuana program after hearing considerable input from members of the public, the cannabis industry and legislators who warned that the rules veered from the intent of House Bill 701, an act passed this session regulating the adult-use pot.
  • Cannabis prices soar in Louisiana due to regulatory bottleneck
    A regulatory bottleneck in Louisiana’s medical marijuana supply chain has inflated costs far beyond the prices found in other states, according to industry experts who testified at the Louisiana Legislature’s Medical Marijuana Commission meeting Thursday.
  • Critics say AZ ‘social equity’ program makes Big Cannabis even richer
    “This is a program that, as currently written, is designed to fail,” attorney Julie Gunnigle said to Arizona Mirror. Gunnigle up until recently worked for Arizona’s Chapter of NORML, an organization that pushes for the reform of marijuana laws across the United States.
  • Bipartisan bill to reduce Wisconsin cannabis fines introduced
    Wisconsin legislators are taking another crack at a bipartisan push to achieve cannabis reform in the state. A new piece of legislation, co-authored by Rep. Shae Sortwell (R-Gibson), Rep. Sylvia Ortiz-Valez (D-Milwaukee), Sen. Lena Taylor (D-Milwaukee) and Sen. Kathleen Bernier (R- Chippewa Falls), reduces existing penalties for cannabis possession.
  • Ret. Navy SEAL: Biden should support medical cannabis research bill
    Cannabis is just another bullet in the bandolier, and I believe it has had a positive impact. It helps treat PTSD symptoms like anxiety, fear and flashbacks. Unfortunately, our military is still culturally behind and bears real animus toward the plant.
  • Ohio senators mulling major revisions to medical cannabis system
    Ohio senators have filed legislation that represents a broad revision of the state’s medical marijuana system. Among the changes is language expanding access to the drug if a physician “reasonably” believes their patient’s symptoms would be relieved or they would otherwise benefit from marijuana.
  • Some Va. Republicans open to speeding retail sales of marijuana
    Newly empowered Republicans in Virginia say plans to allow retail sales of recreational marijuana won’t necessarily be doomed under their control of the House of Delegates and Executive Mansion. And some say they’re open to speeding up the timeline for allowing retail sales, which is currently delayed until 2024.
  • Gov. Reeves: No immediate plans to call special session for nursing crisis, medical marijuana
    Reeves, over the summer, regularly said he was open to calling a special session for medical marijuana and even the nursing crisis stopgap. But since lawmakers finalized bills for both programs, the governor has remained silent about whether he will call a special session at all.